Scenario Analysis
Compare blend strategies for Gamsberg across grade, throughput, recovery and revenue.
Saved Scenarios
| Compare | Scenario | Avg Zn | Avg Pb | Avg SiO₂ | Throughput | Recovery | Revenue | Penalties | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SC-1 · 2026-05-26 17:35 | 7.4% | 1% | 23.1% | 1380 t/h | 88.6% | $412,000 | $8,200 | ||
SC-2 · 2026-05-26 18:02 | 6.8% | 0.9% | 25.8% | 1465 t/h | 86.2% | $398,000 | $14,500 | ||
SC-3 · 2026-05-26 18:15 | 8.6% | 1.3% | 20.4% | 1290 t/h | 91% | $438,000 | $4,100 | ||
SC-4 · 2026-05-26 18:30 | 7.9% | 1.1% | 21.9% | 1340 t/h | 89.4% | $421,000 | $2,800 |
KPI Radar — selected scenarios
Head-to-head comparison
| KPI | Base Case | High Throughput | High Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avg Zn (%) | 7.4 | 6.8 | 8.6 best |
| Avg Pb (%) | 1 | 0.9 | 1.3 best |
| Avg SiO₂ (%) | 23.1 | 25.8 | 20.4 best |
| Throughput (t/h) | 1,380 | 1,465 best | 1,290 |
| Recovery proxy (%) | 88.6 | 86.2 | 91 best |
| Revenue ($/day) | 412,000 | 398,000 | 438,000 best |
| Penalties ($/day) | 8,200 | 14,500 | 4,100 best |